Downloading project writes invalid date-time format

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Downloading project writes invalid date-time format

Joshua Greben
Hello list,

I discovered that the file created by downloading a Webprotege project produces an incorrect date element:


                                                                
                                                                <http://protege.stanford.edu/webprotege/revision> 463 ;
                                                                
                                                                <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/date> "Feb 18, 2014 3:01:06 PM"^^xsd:dateTime ;
                                                                
                                                                <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator> "Hank Smith"^^xsd:string ;
                                                                
                                                                rdfs:comment "This is the collection of subject terms approved by the bibliographers to be used for tagging in Drupal and elsewhere in their sites."^^xsd:string ,
                                                                             "This ontology was generated from an ontology revision in WebProtégé http://localhost:8090/webprotege/"^^xsd:string ;
                                                                
                                                                <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator> "system"^^xsd:string .


This does not follow the ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats in the W3C XML Schema Part 2, and some other software and triple stores have problems loading this export file. Has anyone else ran into this? Sorry if this is a known problem, I could not find specific mention of this in the archives.

- Josh


Joshua Greben
Library Systems Programmer & Analyst
Stanford University Libraries                
(650) 714-1937


_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Downloading project writes invalid date-time format

Matthew Horridge-2
Administrator
Hi Josh,

It looks like this might be a bug.  I’ve filed an issue for this.   You can view it at 


Cheers,

Matthew


On 21 Mar 2014, at 12:56, Joshua Greben <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello list,

I discovered that the file created by downloading a Webprotege project produces an incorrect date element:


                                                                
                                                                <http://protege.stanford.edu/webprotege/revision> 463 ;
                                                                
                                                                <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/date> "Feb 18, 2014 3:01:06 PM"^^xsd:dateTime ;
                                                                
                                                                <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator> "Hank Smith"^^xsd:string ;
                                                                
                                                                rdfs:comment "This is the collection of subject terms approved by the bibliographers to be used for tagging in Drupal and elsewhere in their sites."^^xsd:string ,
                                                                             "This ontology was generated from an ontology revision in WebProtégé http://localhost:8090/webprotege/"^^xsd:string ;
                                                                
                                                                <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator> "system"^^xsd:string .


This does not follow the ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats in the W3C XML Schema Part 2, and some other software and triple stores have problems loading this export file. Has anyone else ran into this? Sorry if this is a known problem, I could not find specific mention of this in the archives.

- Josh


Joshua Greben
Library Systems Programmer & Analyst
Stanford University Libraries                
(650) 714-1937

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user


_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user