On many occasions I meet non-experts who are confused about the
various syntaxes for OWL. Most commonly, they think OWL/XML is also
RDF... and stumble upon problems when trying to read their ontology in
RDF-only OWL tools/applications.
It would be good, I think, if P4 adhered to the file-extensions as
prescribed by the mime-types defined for OWL 2 ontologies.
Leibniz Center for Law | AI Department
Faculty of Law | Faculty of Sciences
Universiteit van Amsterdam | Vrije Universiteit
Kloveniersburgwal 48 | De Boelelaan 1081a
1012 CX Amsterdam | 1081 HV Amsterdam
+31-(0)20-5253499 | +31-(0)20-5987752
[hidden email] | [hidden email]