Help on transforming ontology to OWL format

[jblaya]

Hi everyone,

This is my first email to this email list. I've recently started working at the Human Diagnosis Project and we're looking to get help on our ontology, specifically transforming it into OWL. 

A little about The Human Diagnosis Project. It is a worldwide effort created with and led by the global medical community to build an online, open system that maps the best steps to help any patient. It currently has over 6,000 volunteer physicians worldwide that have created over 1 million cases. By combining collective intelligence with machine learning, we intend to enable more accurate, affordable, and accessible care for all. Human Dx is structured as a partnership between the social, public, and private sectors. Its partners include many of the world’s top medical institutions, boards, and societies.

If you're interested in this project, please contact me, either on this thread or at my email joaquin.blaya -at- icc -dot- humandx -dot- org

Thanks,

--

The Human Diagnosis Project.

One open system.

For all of humankind.

Together.

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[Alex Shkotin]

Hi Joaquin!

keep in mind to visit https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ontolog-forum

Alex

2017-07-26 17:16 GMT+03:00 Joaquin Blaya <[hidden email]>:

Hi everyone,

This is my first email to this email list. I've recently started working at the Human Diagnosis Project and we're looking to get help on our ontology, specifically transforming it into OWL. 

A little about The Human Diagnosis Project. It is a worldwide effort created with and led by the global medical community to build an online, open system that maps the best steps to help any patient. It currently has over 6,000 volunteer physicians worldwide that have created over 1 million cases. By combining collective intelligence with machine learning, we intend to enable more accurate, affordable, and accessible care for all. Human Dx is structured as a partnership between the social, public, and private sectors. Its partners include many of the world’s top medical institutions, boards, and societies.

If you're interested in this project, please contact me, either on this thread or at my email joaquin.blaya -at- icc -dot- humandx -dot- org

Thanks,

--

The Human Diagnosis Project.

One open system.

For all of humankind.

Together.

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[Lorenz Buehmann]

Transform from which format? This is the most important information missing in your description.

On 26.07.2017 16:16, Joaquin Blaya wrote:

Hi everyone,

This is my first email to this email list. I've recently started working at the Human Diagnosis Project and we're looking to get help on our ontology, specifically transforming it into OWL. 

A little about The Human Diagnosis Project. It is a worldwide effort created with and led by the global medical community to build an online, open system that maps the best steps to help any patient. It currently has over 6,000 volunteer physicians worldwide that have created over 1 million cases. By combining collective intelligence with machine learning, we intend to enable more accurate, affordable, and accessible care for all. Human Dx is structured as a partnership between the social, public, and private sectors. Its partners include many of the world’s top medical institutions, boards, and societies.

If you're interested in this project, please contact me, either on this thread or at my email joaquin.blaya -at- icc -dot- humandx -dot- org

Thanks,

--

The Human Diagnosis Project.

One open system.

For all of humankind.

Together.

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[jblaya]

The format is an internal format created by Human Dx, which we hope to make public in the future, but it's not ready yet. This means we'll need someone who is willing to understand our format and help us transform it.

[samsontu]

> On Jul 26, 2017, at 10:50 AM, jblaya <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> The format is an internal format created by Human Dx, which we hope to make
> public in the future, but it's not ready yet. This means we'll need someone
> who is willing to understand our format and help us transform it.
>


If you can transform your ontologies into Excel spreadsheet format, you can use the Cellfie plugin to define rule for transforming the spreadsheet data into an OWL ontology.

Samson
--
Samson Tu                                                      email: [hidden email]
Senior Research Engineer                              web: www.stanford.edu/~swt/
Center for Biomedical Informatics Research phone: [phone]
Stanford University                                          fax: [phone]




_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[Alex Shkotin]

I think the key point should be a design of an ontology for your application area, and then transformation.

It should be something here http://ontologforum.org/index.php/WikiHomePage

I rememder we have discussed Medical domain at some web-sessions.

2017-07-26 20:50 GMT+03:00 jblaya <[hidden email]>:

The format is an internal format created by Human Dx, which we hope to make
public in the future, but it's not ready yet. This means we'll need someone
who is willing to understand our format and help us transform it.



--
View this message in context: http://protege-project.136.n4.nabble.com/Help-on-transforming-ontology-to-OWL-format-tp4669222p4669230.html
Sent from the Protege User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[Lorenz Buehmann]

I don't get it. You can't say anything about your format, so how can
anybody here on the mailing list help you? Is it a request to work for
free on something that is totally unclear? How much time does it take? I
guess most people have a job and it remains open how much time one has
to spend. Note, there are companies out there that provide support in
ontology engineering - maybe this is something that you need? If not,
please provide more details about the task.

On 26.07.2017 19:50, jblaya wrote:

> The format is an internal format created by Human Dx, which we hope to make
> public in the future, but it's not ready yet. This means we'll need someone
> who is willing to understand our format and help us transform it.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://protege-project.136.n4.nabble.com/Help-on-transforming-ontology-to-OWL-format-tp4669222p4669230.html
> Sent from the Protege User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> protege-user mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[jblaya]

I'm fairly new to the ontology space and so I think the best is for someone who has more experience to work on it directly since I wouldn't even have the correct vocabulary for it. So if people were interested (either for free or not) they could email me directly, but yes suggestions for good ontology engineering companies that hopefully have experience in health would be great.

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Lorenz Buehmann [via Protege Project] <[hidden email]> wrote:

I don't get it. You can't say anything about your format, so how can
anybody here on the mailing list help you? Is it a request to work for
free on something that is totally unclear? How much time does it take? I
guess most people have a job and it remains open how much time one has
to spend. Note, there are companies out there that provide support in
ontology engineering - maybe this is something that you need? If not,
please provide more details about the task.

On 26.07.2017 19:50, jblaya wrote:

> The format is an internal format created by Human Dx, which we hope to make
> public in the future, but it's not ready yet. This means we'll need someone
> who is willing to understand our format and help us transform it.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://protege-project.136.n4.nabble.com/Help-on-transforming-ontology-to-OWL-format-tp4669222p4669230.html
> Sent from the Protege User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> protege-user mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://protege-project.136.n4.nabble.com/Help-on-transforming-ontology-to-OWL-format-tp4669222p4669235.html

To unsubscribe from Help on transforming ontology to OWL format, click here.
NAML

--

The Human Diagnosis Project.

One open system.

For all of humankind.

Together.

[Chris Mungall-2]

My main advice would be to reuse, not reinvent. There are a lot of ontologies in this space, e.g. HPO. 

List of open ontologies can be found here obofoundry.org 

You may also want to look at this project (I'm a PI): http://monarchinitiative.org - we're using ontologies extensively for what sound like similar purposes. 

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:21 AM, jblaya <[hidden email]> wrote:

I'm fairly new to the ontology space and so I think the best is for someone who has more experience to work on it directly since I wouldn't even have the correct vocabulary for it. So if people were interested (either for free or not) they could email me directly, but yes suggestions for good ontology engineering companies that hopefully have experience in health would be great.

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Lorenz Buehmann [via Protege Project] <[hidden email]> wrote:

I don't get it. You can't say anything about your format, so how can
anybody here on the mailing list help you? Is it a request to work for
free on something that is totally unclear? How much time does it take? I
guess most people have a job and it remains open how much time one has
to spend. Note, there are companies out there that provide support in
ontology engineering - maybe this is something that you need? If not,
please provide more details about the task.

On 26.07.2017 19:50, jblaya wrote:

> The format is an internal format created by Human Dx, which we hope to make
> public in the future, but it's not ready yet. This means we'll need someone
> who is willing to understand our format and help us transform it.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://protege-project.136.n4.nabble.com/Help-on-transforming-ontology-to-OWL-format-tp4669222p4669230.html
> Sent from the Protege User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> protege-user mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________

protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://protege-project.136.n4.nabble.com/Help-on-transforming-ontology-to-OWL-format-tp4669222p4669235.html

To unsubscribe from Help on transforming ontology to OWL format, click here.
NAML

--

The Human Diagnosis Project.

One open system.

For all of humankind.

Together.

---

View this message in context: Re: Help on transforming ontology to OWL format
Sent from the Protege User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[loic Akebayeri-Ovoundaga]

Bonjour
Bien recu. Je regarde ca enndebut de semaine et on se vois mercredi à setrag
Bien de chose

On 29 Jul 2017 01:53, "Chris Mungall" <[hidden email]> wrote:

My main advice would be to reuse, not reinvent. There are a lot of ontologies in this space, e.g. HPO. 

List of open ontologies can be found here obofoundry.org 

You may also want to look at this project (I'm a PI): http://monarchinitiative.org - we're using ontologies extensively for what sound like similar purposes. 

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:21 AM, jblaya <[hidden email]> wrote:

I'm fairly new to the ontology space and so I think the best is for someone who has more experience to work on it directly since I wouldn't even have the correct vocabulary for it. So if people were interested (either for free or not) they could email me directly, but yes suggestions for good ontology engineering companies that hopefully have experience in health would be great.

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Lorenz Buehmann [via Protege Project] <[hidden email]> wrote:

I don't get it. You can't say anything about your format, so how can
anybody here on the mailing list help you? Is it a request to work for
free on something that is totally unclear? How much time does it take? I
guess most people have a job and it remains open how much time one has
to spend. Note, there are companies out there that provide support in
ontology engineering - maybe this is something that you need? If not,
please provide more details about the task.

On 26.07.2017 19:50, jblaya wrote:

> The format is an internal format created by Human Dx, which we hope to make
> public in the future, but it's not ready yet. This means we'll need someone
> who is willing to understand our format and help us transform it.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://protege-project.136.n4.nabble.com/Help-on-transforming-ontology-to-OWL-format-tp4669222p4669230.html
> Sent from the Protege User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> protege-user mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________

protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://protege-project.136.n4.nabble.com/Help-on-transforming-ontology-to-OWL-format-tp4669222p4669235.html

To unsubscribe from Help on transforming ontology to OWL format, click here.
NAML

--

The Human Diagnosis Project.

One open system.

For all of humankind.

Together.

---

View this message in context: Re: Help on transforming ontology to OWL format
Sent from the Protege User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user