Thanks for the fast reply. Then I have to work with a generic superProperty I guess.
Von: Lorenz Bühmann [via Protege Project] [mailto:ml-node+[hidden email]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Januar 2015 14:11
An: Geißler, Christian
Betreff: Re: Manchester Syntax Question: cardinalities and choice between multiple properties
shortly asnwer, no. There is no OWL construct that allows for the union
of OWL property expressions.
> I would like to express a class, that has at least 2 objectProperties of a
> given set. I would expect, that it would look like:
> MyClass and (firstProperty or secondProperty) min 2 MyOtherClass
> But that doesn't work. However, I was able to express that by writing:
> (firstProperty min 2 MyOtherClass)
> (secondProperty min 2 MyOtherClass)
> (firstProperty min 1 MyOtherClass)
> (secondProperty min 1 MyOtherClass)
> So now I wonder, if there is a more convenient shorter way to write this
> expression or not.
> greetings and a nice weekend,
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the Protege User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> protege-user mailing list
> [hidden email]
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
protege-user mailing list
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
To unsubscribe from Manchester Syntax Question: cardinalities and choice between multiple properties,