OWL: modelling XOR relations

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OWL: modelling XOR relations

Bellamy Baron

Hi, 

There has always been a lot debate around XOR. You could use an XOR and attach a document to it explaining the decision in more details. Also, you can model that the decision must be taken by a manager and that he must document his decision.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Best regards,

Bellamy
Specialist  - iWYZE
Office: 75 Helen Joseph Street, JHB
 
Csongor Nyulas csongor.nyulas at stanford.edu 
Wed Aug 31 19:19:13 PDT 2016
Previous message: [protege-user] Ways to create Object property
Next message: [protege-user] How to apply an object property to an anonymous class in Protege
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Jiang,

I see that both Rafael and Samson assumes that you want to create object 
properties in your ontology (i.e. to declare new object properties), 
which, after re-reading your message, seems to be what you want. I have 
to admit, however, that at first read I thought that you want to add 
multiple object property assertions (such as "ind1 hasSomeProperty 
ind2") to your ontology. Just to avoid any miscommunication, could you 
please clarify which of these two interpretation did you have in mind?

My response below will be based on Rafael's and Samson's interpretation 
of your question.

Samson is right that Cellfie does not support the Object property 
declarations yet, as it is mentioned here [1]. However, we have received 
requests for this feature before, and we have created an issue for this 
[2], which you can follow, if interested. This feature will not be 
included in the upcoming release, though. Maybe in the one after that.

In the meantime, if we are talking about hacks, you can also try to use 
Cellfie's feature to create object properties as a "side effect" of 
creating object property assertions or class restrictions. For example, 
you could try this:
1. Create a spreadsheet in which you enumerate in column A all the 
properties that you want to create
2. Open your ontology and create a class called "Dummy"
3. Start Cellfie, load the spreadsheet, and create the following rule 
that applies to column range (A,A) and rows (1,+):
   Class: Dummy
     SubClassOf: @A*(ObjectProperty) some owl:Thing
4. Execute the rule and add the axioms to your current ontology, then 
close Cellfie (saving the rules is not important).
5. Save the ontology; Close and reopen Protege; Load your ontology
6. Delete the "Dummy" class, and save your ontology.

Note: Step 5 is important, because if you skip it, when you delete the 
"Dummy" class in step 6, all existing references to the object 
properties will be deleted with it.

BTW, I have created an issue to add functionality to Protege that would 
allow the creation of property hierarchies: 

Csongor

[1] 


On 08/31/2016 01:09 PM, Samson Tu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately Cellfie doesn’t allow you to create properties right now.
>
> I have a hack that may speed up the creation process little. Write in 
> a text file a dummy SWRL rule that uses all of the properties you want 
> to create. Copy and paste the rule into the ROWLTab (from the ROWL 
> Protege 5.0+ Plugin), then right click on the undefined binary 
> predicates to create them. Using this (admittedly inelegant) hack may 
> be less painful than creating a large number of object properties one 
> by one through the Protege UI.
>
> /With best regards,/
> /Samson/
>
>
>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Rafael Gonçalves 
>> <rafael.goncalves at stanford.edu 
>> <mailto:[hidden email] at stanford.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> One way to add multiple object properties is using the Cellfie 
>> plugin, which allows you to generate axioms from an Excel 
>> spreadsheet. Have a look here: 
>>
>> Alternatively, if you’re comfortable with Java and the OWL API 
>> (http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/), you could programmatically add the 
>> object property declarations to your ontology.
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rafael
>>
>>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 06:57, fredjiang <jiangpingfei at gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:[hidden email] at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, I am wondering in protege 5.0.0 do I have to create each individual
>>> Object property manually by clicking the icons?
>>>
>>> Is there an fast way to create a list of Object porperty?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: 
>>> Sent from the Protege User mailing list archive at Nabble.com 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> protege-user mailing list
>>> protege-user at lists.stanford.edu <mailto:[hidden email] at lists.stanford.edu>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-user mailing list
>
> -- 
> Samson Tu  email: swt at stanford.edu <mailto:[hidden email] at stanford.edu>
> Senior Research Engineer                              web: 
> Center for Biomedical Informatics Research phone: 1-650-725-3391
> Stanford University  fax: 1-650-725-7944
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-user mailing list
> protege-user at lists.stanford.edu


--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bellamy
Specialist  - iWYZE
https://www.iwyze.co.za/products/car-insurance

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user