Re: Ontology Repository |
|||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
OK_build241_Tools_Generate_OWL
|
In reply to this post by Ronnie Valkky
Hi,
works fine & nice job, thanks to whoever has done this software! cheers, Ronnie ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html |
In reply to this post by Ronnie Valkky
Hi Ronnie,
The trouble is, I can rename my jdk to anything I'd like. There are surely ways to identify the JDK from its signature etc. but this process might be unreliable. I would therefore rather select the VM of my choice... In any case, less experienced users would probably download the version with its own VM anyway... they won't get the choice. Cheers, Rinke Ronnie Valkky wrote: > Hi, > > I installed Protege version 3.2. build 241. > Installation program found all Java virtual machines (VM) in my workstation > ok. > I selected the VM in folder f:\sw\j2sdk-1_5, not the one in h:\j2sdk1.4.2 . > > Could installation software be based on a reasoner or smart logic so that > it could select the proper Java VM automatically ? > > In my case the wrong choice would have been to tell installer to use Java VM > in h:\j2sdk1.4.2. > > More generally this boils down to know which versions you need from each > software component > to have a working system for you and to get support to it !? > > Installation went ok and build 241 is working fine, thanks guys! > > Cheers > Ronnie > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html > > -- -------------------------------------- Rinke Hoekstra [hidden email] T: +31-20-5253499 F: +31-20-5253495 Leibniz Center for Law, Law Faculty University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands -------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html |
How does one find out which jdk Protege is using? I'm not sure why
top shows no jvm running when Protege is running. I guess the two are deeply intertwingled. My OS X runtime is 1.5.0_06-93. - Bob -- _______________________________________________________________ Robert P. Futrelle | Biological Knowledge Laboratory Associate Professor | College of Computer and Information | Science MS WVH202 Office: (617)-373-4239 | Northeastern University Fax: (617)-373-5121 | 360 Huntington Ave. [hidden email] | Boston, MA 02115 http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/futrelle http://www.bionlp.org http://www.diagrams.org http://biologicalknowledge.com mailto:[hidden email] _______________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html |
Hi Bob,
I have in Win XP Protege 3.2_beta build 241 installed in folder F:\sw\Protege_3.2_beta the folder F:\sw\Protege3.2beta\logs contains file protege_0.log which tells jdk as follows: 2006.01.24 09:57:28.781 EET CONFIG: Protege 3.2 Build 241, JVM 1.5.0_05-b05, memory=99M, Windows XP, encoding=UTF-8, language=en, country=US -- SystemUtilities.logSystemInfo() Also when I start Protege it calls java.exe and displays the information showing which jdk it is using. When I installed Protege installation program did find all java VMs I was using. However, I had to tell it which JVM to use and this is one point where mistakes are being done. Also when using Protege and Help for example it tells the build version but not JVM it is using, it could ? Hopefully this helped. Cheers Ronnie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Futrelle" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:25 PM Subject: [protege-owl] Which jdk am I using? > How does one find out which jdk Protege is using? I'm not sure why > top shows no jvm running when Protege is running. I guess the two > are deeply intertwingled. > > My OS X runtime is 1.5.0_06-93. > > - Bob > -- > _______________________________________________________________ > Robert P. Futrelle | Biological Knowledge Laboratory > Associate Professor | College of Computer and Information > | Science MS WVH202 > Office: (617)-373-4239 | Northeastern University > Fax: (617)-373-5121 | 360 Huntington Ave. > [hidden email] | Boston, MA 02115 > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/futrelle > http://www.bionlp.org http://www.diagrams.org > > http://biologicalknowledge.com > mailto:[hidden email] > _______________________________________________________________ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html |
In reply to this post by Robert Futrelle
Hi Bob,
You can run the protege by using the run_protege.applescript script in the Protege installation directory. Or you can set the 1.5 to be the default JRE. You can do it by starting /Applications/Utilities/Java/J2SE 5.0/Java Preferences, go to the "General Tab", locate "Java Application Runtime Settings", and drag the J2SE 5.0 line so that it is first in the list. Once this change is made you can use the standard Mac Protege application launcher. Regards Hai On 24 Jan 2006, at 17:25, Robert Futrelle wrote: > How does one find out which jdk Protege is using? I'm not sure why > top shows no jvm running when Protege is running. I guess the two > are deeply intertwingled. > > My OS X runtime is 1.5.0_06-93. > > - Bob > -- > _______________________________________________________________ > Robert P. Futrelle | Biological Knowledge Laboratory > Associate Professor | College of Computer and Information > | Science MS WVH202 > Office: (617)-373-4239 | Northeastern University > Fax: (617)-373-5121 | 360 Huntington Ave. > [hidden email] | Boston, MA 02115 > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/futrelle > http://www.bionlp.org http://www.diagrams.org > > http://biologicalknowledge.com > mailto:[hidden email] > _______________________________________________________________ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/ > subscribe.html > Regards Hai Research Associate Department of Computer Science Kilburn Building University of Manchester Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PL UK Homepage: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~hwang ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html |
In reply to this post by Ronnie Valkky
You can delete these by hand.
Or leave it - as long as they are empty. Nick Ronnie Valkky wrote: >Hi, > >I uninstalled previous Protege OWL version to install the new version 3.2. >build 241. >Uninstallation did not delete folder f:\sw\Protege_3.2_beta and it's >subfolder \logs. >Is that ok? > >Cheers, >Ronnie > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html > > > > -- Nick Drummond http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~drummond/ <http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/%7Edrummond/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |