Re: p4-feedback Digest, Vol 87, Issue 15

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: p4-feedback Digest, Vol 87, Issue 15

BlackRyno
I'm not sure that Protege's smooth performance on 10.91 answer's the question.  I had a compatibility issue last summer, concerning which Jennifer Vendetti wrote at the time:

We had reports on the mailing list a couple of weeks ago about a Java 
update for the Mac that caused issues with Protege (and other 
applications).  There was a subsequent Java update that fixed the problem:

java version "1.6.0_51"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_51-b11-457-11M4509)

From this I infer that Java updates for OS X are not necessarily issue-free.  Is there a way to compare the version of Java running on Dr. Lipori's 10.9.1 with Update 17 for 10.6.8?  Or, to ask a slightly different question, has anyone installed Update 17 without problems for Protege?

Robert Rynasiewicz  

On Mon 23.12.13, at 2:46 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:46:31 +0000
From: "Lipori, Gigi Pflugfelder" <[hidden email]>
To: "Protege 4.x support and discussion"
<[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [p4-feedback] Protege compatibility with Java for Mac OS
X 10.6 Update 17
Message-ID: <CEDDFD3F.3C204%[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

It works fine on my 10.9.1 machine.


On 12/23/13 2:10 PM, "Robert Rynasiewicz" <[hidden email]> wrote:

This is a very basic question.  I ask only because I needed to install
Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 16 in order to launch Protege 4.3.  Apple
has now sent out Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 17.  I'm worried that if I
install it, Protege 4.3 may not launch properly.  Can I safely assume
that Protege 4.3 is forward compatible with Java for Mac OS X 10.6
updates?

Thank you very kindly,
Robert Rynasiewicz



_______________________________________________
p4-feedback mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/p4-feedback
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: p4-feedback Digest, Vol 87, Issue 15

Lipori, Gigi Pflugfelder

Running 1.7.0_45-b18

From: Robert Rynasiewicz <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: "Protege 4.x support and discussion" <[hidden email]>
Date: Monday, December 23, 2013 at 4:11 PM
To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [p4-feedback] p4-feedback Digest, Vol 87, Issue 15

I'm not sure that Protege's smooth performance on 10.91 answer's the question.  I had a compatibility issue last summer, concerning which Jennifer Vendetti wrote at the time:

We had reports on the mailing list a couple of weeks ago about a Java 
update for the Mac that caused issues with Protege (and other 
applications).  There was a subsequent Java update that fixed the problem:

java version "1.6.0_51"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_51-b11-457-11M4509)

From this I infer that Java updates for OS X are not necessarily issue-free.  Is there a way to compare the version of Java running on Dr. Lipori's 10.9.1 with Update 17 for 10.6.8?  Or, to ask a slightly different question, has anyone installed Update 17 without problems for Protege?

Robert Rynasiewicz  

On Mon 23.12.13, at 2:46 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:46:31 +0000
From: "Lipori, Gigi Pflugfelder" <[hidden email]>
To: "Protege 4.x support and discussion"
<[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [p4-feedback] Protege compatibility with Java for Mac OS
X 10.6 Update 17
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

It works fine on my 10.9.1 machine.


On 12/23/13 2:10 PM, "Robert Rynasiewicz" <[hidden email]> wrote:

This is a very basic question.  I ask only because I needed to install
Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 16 in order to launch Protege 4.3.  Apple
has now sent out Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 17.  I'm worried that if I
install it, Protege 4.3 may not launch properly.  Can I safely assume
that Protege 4.3 is forward compatible with Java for Mac OS X 10.6
updates?

Thank you very kindly,
Robert Rynasiewicz



_______________________________________________
p4-feedback mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/p4-feedback