Re: protege-dev Digest, Vol 26, Issue 17

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: protege-dev Digest, Vol 26, Issue 17

Rosetta
Answer to message: 5

Hello Lorenz,

No it is when I am relating an existing class to another existing class using an existing property.


Message: 5
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:49:10 +0200
From: "Lorenz B." <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [protege-dev] Syntax for properties
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"

Hello Rosetta,

do you mean when you create a new object property and enter the name
into the input text field?

Lorenz

> I have noticed that a slight change in a property name results in a
> ?literal? rather than a ?class? icon being offered in the value column.
>
> For example:
>
> Entering the property ?has a rule-based Add-on service trigger? will
> offer a literal value, while entering the property ?has a rule based
> Add-on service trigger? will offer a class value.  Are these types of
> rules described in a document?
>
> Rosetta Romano
>
>
------------------------------
Answer to
Message: 7 - Yes this is in WebProtege

Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:37:18 +0000
From: Matthew Horridge <[hidden email]>
To: Developer support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
        <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [protege-dev] Syntax for properties
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Rosetta,

Is this in WebProtege?

Cheers,

Matthew


On 28 Mar 2016, at 22:03, Rosetta.Romano <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

I have noticed that a slight change in a property name results in a ?literal? rather than a ?class? icon being offered in the value column.

For example:

Entering the property ?has a rule-based Add-on service trigger? will offer a literal value, while entering the property ?has a rule based Add-on service trigger? will offer a class value.  Are these types of rules described in a document?


Rosetta Romano


------------------------------
Answer to Message: 8
Ah, yes there are 2 different property types
1) 'has a rule-based add-on service trigger' is a Data property
2) 'has a rule based add-on service trigger' is an Object property

Why does it matter?  Is there something I can read that will help me to understand the problem I have created for myself.


Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:48:32 +0000
From: Matthew Horridge <[hidden email]>
To: Developer support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
        <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [protege-dev] UI changes the class type to a literal
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Rosetta,

The size looks fine here.  From the behaviour that you describe, I would guess that the property

has a rule-base Add-on server trigger

is a data property.  You can confirm this by looking at the properties tab.  Please can you check whether this is the case or not?

Thanks,

Matthew



On 28 Mar 2016, at 21:25, Rosetta.Romano <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

Hi there,

Having a few problems today.  I am using WebProtege through the UI.  I have attached a view of a class (highlighted), but when I enter it transforms into a literal (see last line).  I have also displayed the metrics, as I am hoping that it would not be a size issue.

<image001.png>


<image002.png>


Rosetta Romano

PhD Candidate
Faculty of Business Government and Law
University of Canberra
Mobile 0477 393 145
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>

_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/71173133/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Answer to Message: 9 - I did work out that it only allows me to enter the data property and not the object property.  But I still don't know why it matters.  The 'no' icon may have been a firewall issue.  It hasn't happened again, so not sure.  Thanks Matthew
 
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:49:43 +0000
From: Matthew Horridge <[hidden email]>
To: Developer support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
        <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [protege-dev] The No icon is appearing
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Rosetta,

Did you sort this out?  I?m just wondering as I?ve seen other messages from you on the list.

Cheers,

Matthew

On 28 Mar 2016, at 20:56, Rosetta.Romano <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

Hi there,

The ?No? icon <image001.png> is appearing in my WebProtege ontology.  I am accessing it through the web UI.  I am also having problems entering new relationships to an existing class.  Is there a limit to how many line entries can be loaded to a class in the web UI?

Rosetta
Rosetta Romano

PhD Candidate
Faculty of Business Government and Law
University of Canberra
Mobile 0477 393 145
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>

_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/5374bc1f/attachment-0001.html>
-----Original Message-----
From: protege-dev [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of [hidden email]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2016 6:04 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: protege-dev Digest, Vol 26, Issue 17

Send protege-dev mailing list submissions to
        [hidden email]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [hidden email]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [hidden email]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of protege-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. The No icon is appearing (Rosetta.Romano)
   2. UI changes the class type to a literal (Rosetta.Romano)
   3. Syntax for properties (Rosetta.Romano)
   4. Re: Extend existing view component (Lorenz B.)
   5. Re: Syntax for properties (Lorenz B.)
   6. Re: Extend existing view component (Lorenz B.)
   7. Re: Syntax for properties (Matthew Horridge)
   8. Re: UI changes the class type to a literal (Matthew Horridge)
   9. Re: The No icon is appearing (Matthew Horridge)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 03:56:05 +0000
From: "Rosetta.Romano" <[hidden email]>
To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: [protege-dev] The No icon is appearing
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>
       
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi there,

The 'No' icon [cid:image001.png@01D189B3.4541DA70]  is appearing in my WebProtege ontology.  I am accessing it through the web UI.  I am also having problems entering new relationships to an existing class.  Is there a limit to how many line entries can be loaded to a class in the web UI?

Rosetta
Rosetta Romano

PhD Candidate
Faculty of Business Government and Law
University of Canberra
Mobile 0477 393 145
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/ade72b9e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 693 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/ade72b9e/attachment-0001.png>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 04:25:33 +0000
From: "Rosetta.Romano" <[hidden email]>
To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: [protege-dev] UI changes the class type to a literal
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>
       
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi there,

Having a few problems today.  I am using WebProtege through the UI.  I have attached a view of a class (highlighted), but when I enter it transforms into a literal (see last line).  I have also displayed the metrics, as I am hoping that it would not be a size issue.

[cid:image001.png@01D189CF.3AA0B020]


[cid:image002.png@01D189CF.3AA0B020]


Rosetta Romano

PhD Candidate
Faculty of Business Government and Law
University of Canberra
Mobile 0477 393 145
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/dff88d18/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 24974 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/dff88d18/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 20566 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/dff88d18/attachment-0003.png>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 05:03:13 +0000
From: "Rosetta.Romano" <[hidden email]>
To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: [protege-dev] Syntax for properties
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>
       
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I have noticed that a slight change in a property name results in a 'literal' rather than a 'class' icon being offered in the value column.

For example:

Entering the property "has a rule-based Add-on service trigger" will offer a literal value, while entering the property "has a rule based Add-on service trigger" will offer a class value.  Are these types of rules described in a document?


Rosetta Romano

PhD Candidate
Faculty of Business Government and Law
University of Canberra
Mobile 0477 393 145
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/97baf3ba/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:47:21 +0200
From: "Lorenz B." <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [protege-dev] Extend existing view component
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"

Hello Matthew,

thank you, I'll give it a try and see whether it fit's the user requirements.


Kind regards,
Lorenz

> Hi Lorenz,
>
> The very latest beta release supports context menu actions in the
> asserted class hierarchy.  You can plug these in as you might do for
> regular menu actions.  Here?s an example,
>
> <extension id="context.edit.duplicate"
> point="org.protege.editor.core.application.EditorKitMenuAction">
>      <name value="Duplicate class..."/>
>      <class
> value="org.protege.editor.owl.ui.action.DuplicateSelectedClassAction"/>
>      <toolTip value="Duplicates the current class. This copies the class,
> its superclasses and equivalent classes."/>
>      <path value="[AssertedClassHierarchy]/SlotC-F"/>
>      <editorKitId value="OWLEditorKit"/>
>      <accelerator value="shift C"/>
> </extension>
>
> Note that the root of the path must be [AssertedClassHierarchy] - the
> square brackets are important.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
>> On 26 Mar 2016, at 08:05, Lorenz B.
>> <[hidden email]
>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Protege developers,
>>
>> I'm currently developing a plugin for Protege 5.x. Ideally, I could
>> somehow extend the existing class hierarchy view by an additional
>> action besides "add_sub", "add_sibling" and "delete". Is there any
>> way to achieve this? So far, I created a new view component, but this
>> is more or less unnecessarily complicated.
>> I tried to achieve this somehow by a plugin of type EditorKitHook, in
>> which I scanned all existing plugins for the class hierarchy
>> component. Unfortunately, at this time the view component itself has
>> not been created yet, thus, it's impossible to add another action to it.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Lorenz
>>
>> --
>> Lorenz B?hmann
>> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
>> Group:http://aksw.org  - semantic web research center
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev

--
Lorenz B?hmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/a87dfb05/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:49:10 +0200
From: "Lorenz B." <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [protege-dev] Syntax for properties
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"

Hello Rosetta,

do you mean when you create a new object property and enter the name
into the input text field?

Lorenz

> I have noticed that a slight change in a property name results in a
> ?literal? rather than a ?class? icon being offered in the value column.
>
> For example:
>
> Entering the property ?has a rule-based Add-on service trigger? will
> offer a literal value, while entering the property ?has a rule based
> Add-on service trigger? will offer a class value.  Are these types of
> rules described in a document?
>
> Rosetta Romano
>
> PhD Candidate
> Faculty of Business Government and Law
> University of Canberra
>
> Mobile 0477 393 145
>
> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev

--
Lorenz B?hmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/f3b695ef/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:41:45 +0200
From: "Lorenz B." <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [protege-dev] Extend existing view component
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"

Hi Matthew,

it perfectly works and it's a good way to integrate my plugin.

Just a comment:
I don't know whether it's a bug, but some actions of the context menu of
the class hierarchy disappear once you change the entity rendering in
the menu.



Kind regards,
Lorenz

> Hello Matthew,
>
> thank you, I'll give it a try and see whether it fit's the user
> requirements.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Lorenz
>
>> Hi Lorenz,
>>
>> The very latest beta release supports context menu actions in the
>> asserted class hierarchy.  You can plug these in as you might do for
>> regular menu actions.  Here?s an example,
>>
>> <extension id="context.edit.duplicate"
>> point="org.protege.editor.core.application.EditorKitMenuAction">
>>      <name value="Duplicate class..."/>
>>      <class
>> value="org.protege.editor.owl.ui.action.DuplicateSelectedClassAction"/>
>>      <toolTip value="Duplicates the current class. This copies the class,
>> its superclasses and equivalent classes."/>
>>      <path value="[AssertedClassHierarchy]/SlotC-F"/>
>>      <editorKitId value="OWLEditorKit"/>
>>      <accelerator value="shift C"/>
>> </extension>
>>
>> Note that the root of the path must be [AssertedClassHierarchy] - the
>> square brackets are important.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 26 Mar 2016, at 08:05, Lorenz B.
>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Protege developers,
>>>
>>> I'm currently developing a plugin for Protege 5.x. Ideally, I could
>>> somehow extend the existing class hierarchy view by an additional
>>> action besides "add_sub", "add_sibling" and "delete". Is there any
>>> way to achieve this? So far, I created a new view component, but
>>> this is more or less unnecessarily complicated.
>>> I tried to achieve this somehow by a plugin of type EditorKitHook,
>>> in which I scanned all existing plugins for the class hierarchy
>>> component. Unfortunately, at this time the view component itself has
>>> not been created yet, thus, it's impossible to add another action to it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Lorenz
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lorenz B?hmann
>>> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
>>> Group:http://aksw.org  - semantic web research center
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> protege-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev
> --
> Lorenz B?hmann
> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
> Group:http://aksw.org  - semantic web research center
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev

--
Lorenz B?hmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/9cd6d38a/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:37:18 +0000
From: Matthew Horridge <[hidden email]>
To: Developer support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
        <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [protege-dev] Syntax for properties
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Rosetta,

Is this in WebProtege?

Cheers,

Matthew


On 28 Mar 2016, at 22:03, Rosetta.Romano <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

I have noticed that a slight change in a property name results in a ?literal? rather than a ?class? icon being offered in the value column.

For example:

Entering the property ?has a rule-based Add-on service trigger? will offer a literal value, while entering the property ?has a rule based Add-on service trigger? will offer a class value.  Are these types of rules described in a document?


Rosetta Romano

PhD Candidate
Faculty of Business Government and Law
University of Canberra
Mobile 0477 393 145
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>

_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/6c7a6827/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:48:32 +0000
From: Matthew Horridge <[hidden email]>
To: Developer support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
        <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [protege-dev] UI changes the class type to a literal
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Rosetta,

The size looks fine here.  From the behaviour that you describe, I would guess that the property

has a rule-base Add-on server trigger

is a data property.  You can confirm this by looking at the properties tab.  Please can you check whether this is the case or not?

Thanks,

Matthew



On 28 Mar 2016, at 21:25, Rosetta.Romano <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

Hi there,

Having a few problems today.  I am using WebProtege through the UI.  I have attached a view of a class (highlighted), but when I enter it transforms into a literal (see last line).  I have also displayed the metrics, as I am hoping that it would not be a size issue.

<image001.png>


<image002.png>


Rosetta Romano

PhD Candidate
Faculty of Business Government and Law
University of Canberra
Mobile 0477 393 145
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>

_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/71173133/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:49:43 +0000
From: Matthew Horridge <[hidden email]>
To: Developer support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
        <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [protege-dev] The No icon is appearing
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Rosetta,

Did you sort this out?  I?m just wondering as I?ve seen other messages from you on the list.

Cheers,

Matthew

On 28 Mar 2016, at 20:56, Rosetta.Romano <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:

Hi there,

The ?No? icon <image001.png> is appearing in my WebProtege ontology.  I am accessing it through the web UI.  I am also having problems entering new relationships to an existing class.  Is there a limit to how many line entries can be loaded to a class in the web UI?

Rosetta
Rosetta Romano

PhD Candidate
Faculty of Business Government and Law
University of Canberra
Mobile 0477 393 145
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>

_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/5374bc1f/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev


------------------------------

End of protege-dev Digest, Vol 26, Issue 17
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: protege-dev Digest, Vol 26, Issue 17

Lorenz Buehmann
Hello Rosetta,

how do you define a relationship between 2 classes using a property in OWL?

Kind regards,
Lorenz

> Answer to message: 5
>
> Hello Lorenz,
>
> No it is when I am relating an existing class to another existing class using an existing property.
>
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:49:10 +0200
> From: "Lorenz B." <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [protege-dev] Syntax for properties
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
>
> Hello Rosetta,
>
> do you mean when you create a new object property and enter the name
> into the input text field?
>
> Lorenz
>
>> I have noticed that a slight change in a property name results in a
>> ?literal? rather than a ?class? icon being offered in the value column.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> Entering the property ?has a rule-based Add-on service trigger? will
>> offer a literal value, while entering the property ?has a rule based
>> Add-on service trigger? will offer a class value.  Are these types of
>> rules described in a document?
>>
>> Rosetta Romano
>>
>>
> ------------------------------
> Answer to
> Message: 7 - Yes this is in WebProtege
>
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:37:18 +0000
> From: Matthew Horridge <[hidden email]>
> To: Developer support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
> <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [protege-dev] Syntax for properties
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Rosetta,
>
> Is this in WebProtege?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 28 Mar 2016, at 22:03, Rosetta.Romano <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
> I have noticed that a slight change in a property name results in a ?literal? rather than a ?class? icon being offered in the value column.
>
> For example:
>
> Entering the property ?has a rule-based Add-on service trigger? will offer a literal value, while entering the property ?has a rule based Add-on service trigger? will offer a class value.  Are these types of rules described in a document?
>
>
> Rosetta Romano
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Answer to Message: 8
> Ah, yes there are 2 different property types
> 1) 'has a rule-based add-on service trigger' is a Data property
> 2) 'has a rule based add-on service trigger' is an Object property
>
> Why does it matter?  Is there something I can read that will help me to understand the problem I have created for myself.
>
>
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:48:32 +0000
> From: Matthew Horridge <[hidden email]>
> To: Developer support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
> <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [protege-dev] UI changes the class type to a literal
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Rosetta,
>
> The size looks fine here.  From the behaviour that you describe, I would guess that the property
>
> has a rule-base Add-on server trigger
>
> is a data property.  You can confirm this by looking at the properties tab.  Please can you check whether this is the case or not?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> On 28 Mar 2016, at 21:25, Rosetta.Romano <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Having a few problems today.  I am using WebProtege through the UI.  I have attached a view of a class (highlighted), but when I enter it transforms into a literal (see last line).  I have also displayed the metrics, as I am hoping that it would not be a size issue.
>
> <image001.png>
>
>
> <image002.png>
>
>
> Rosetta Romano
>
> PhD Candidate
> Faculty of Business Government and Law
> University of Canberra
> Mobile 0477 393 145
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/71173133/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Answer to Message: 9 - I did work out that it only allows me to enter the data property and not the object property.  But I still don't know why it matters.  The 'no' icon may have been a firewall issue.  It hasn't happened again, so not sure.  Thanks Matthew
>  
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:49:43 +0000
> From: Matthew Horridge <[hidden email]>
> To: Developer support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
> <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [protege-dev] The No icon is appearing
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Rosetta,
>
> Did you sort this out?  I?m just wondering as I?ve seen other messages from you on the list.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
> On 28 Mar 2016, at 20:56, Rosetta.Romano <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> The ?No? icon <image001.png> is appearing in my WebProtege ontology.  I am accessing it through the web UI.  I am also having problems entering new relationships to an existing class.  Is there a limit to how many line entries can be loaded to a class in the web UI?
>
> Rosetta
> Rosetta Romano
>
> PhD Candidate
> Faculty of Business Government and Law
> University of Canberra
> Mobile 0477 393 145
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
>
> _______________________________________________
> protege-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/5374bc1f/attachment-0001.html>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: protege-dev [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of [hidden email]
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2016 6:04 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: protege-dev Digest, Vol 26, Issue 17
>
> Send protege-dev mailing list submissions to
> [hidden email]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [hidden email]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [hidden email]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of protege-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. The No icon is appearing (Rosetta.Romano)
>     2. UI changes the class type to a literal (Rosetta.Romano)
>     3. Syntax for properties (Rosetta.Romano)
>     4. Re: Extend existing view component (Lorenz B.)
>     5. Re: Syntax for properties (Lorenz B.)
>     6. Re: Extend existing view component (Lorenz B.)
>     7. Re: Syntax for properties (Matthew Horridge)
>     8. Re: UI changes the class type to a literal (Matthew Horridge)
>     9. Re: The No icon is appearing (Matthew Horridge)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 03:56:05 +0000
> From: "Rosetta.Romano" <[hidden email]>
> To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [protege-dev] The No icon is appearing
> Message-ID:
> <[hidden email]>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi there,
>
> The 'No' icon [cid:image001.png@01D189B3.4541DA70]  is appearing in my WebProtege ontology.  I am accessing it through the web UI.  I am also having problems entering new relationships to an existing class.  Is there a limit to how many line entries can be loaded to a class in the web UI?
>
> Rosetta
> Rosetta Romano
>
> PhD Candidate
> Faculty of Business Government and Law
> University of Canberra
> Mobile 0477 393 145
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/ade72b9e/attachment-0001.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 693 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/ade72b9e/attachment-0001.png>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 04:25:33 +0000
> From: "Rosetta.Romano" <[hidden email]>
> To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [protege-dev] UI changes the class type to a literal
> Message-ID:
> <[hidden email]>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi there,
>
> Having a few problems today.  I am using WebProtege through the UI.  I have attached a view of a class (highlighted), but when I enter it transforms into a literal (see last line).  I have also displayed the metrics, as I am hoping that it would not be a size issue.
>
> [cid:image001.png@01D189CF.3AA0B020]
>
>
> [cid:image002.png@01D189CF.3AA0B020]
>
>
> Rosetta Romano
>
> PhD Candidate
> Faculty of Business Government and Law
> University of Canberra
> Mobile 0477 393 145
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/dff88d18/attachment-0001.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 24974 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/dff88d18/attachment-0002.png>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image002.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 20566 bytes
> Desc: image002.png
> URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/dff88d18/attachment-0003.png>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 05:03:13 +0000
> From: "Rosetta.Romano" <[hidden email]>
> To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [protege-dev] Syntax for properties
> Message-ID:
> <[hidden email]>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I have noticed that a slight change in a property name results in a 'literal' rather than a 'class' icon being offered in the value column.
>
> For example:
>
> Entering the property "has a rule-based Add-on service trigger" will offer a literal value, while entering the property "has a rule based Add-on service trigger" will offer a class value.  Are these types of rules described in a document?
>
>
> Rosetta Romano
>
> PhD Candidate
> Faculty of Business Government and Law
> University of Canberra
> Mobile 0477 393 145
> [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/protege-dev/attachments/20160329/97baf3ba/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:47:21 +0200
> From: "Lorenz B." <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [protege-dev] Extend existing view component
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
>
> Hello Matthew,
>
> thank you, I'll give it a try and see whether it fit's the user requirements.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Lorenz
>
>> Hi Lorenz,
>>
>> The very latest beta release supports context menu actions in the
>> asserted class hierarchy.  You can plug these in as you might do for
>> regular menu actions.  Here?s an example,
>>
>> <extension id="context.edit.duplicate"
>> point="org.protege.editor.core.application.EditorKitMenuAction">
>>       <name value="Duplicate class..."/>
>>       <class
>> value="org.protege.editor.owl.ui.action.DuplicateSelectedClassAction"/>
>>       <toolTip value="Duplicates the current class. This copies the class,
>> its superclasses and equivalent classes."/>
>>       <path value="[AssertedClassHierarchy]/SlotC-F"/>
>>       <editorKitId value="OWLEditorKit"/>
>>       <accelerator value="shift C"/>
>> </extension>
>>
>> Note that the root of the path must be [AssertedClassHierarchy] - the
>> square brackets are important.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 26 Mar 2016, at 08:05, Lorenz B.
>>> <[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Protege developers,
>>>
>>> I'm currently developing a plugin for Protege 5.x. Ideally, I could
>>> somehow extend the existing class hierarchy view by an additional
>>> action besides "add_sub", "add_sibling" and "delete". Is there any
>>> way to achieve this? So far, I created a new view component, but this
>>> is more or less unnecessarily complicated.
>>> I tried to achieve this somehow by a plugin of type EditorKitHook, in
>>> which I scanned all existing plugins for the class hierarchy
>>> component. Unfortunately, at this time the view component itself has
>>> not been created yet, thus, it's impossible to add another action to it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Lorenz
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lorenz B?hmann
>>> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
>>> Group:http://aksw.org  - semantic web research center
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> protege-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> protege-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev

--
Lorenz B├╝hmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center

_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev