SWRL a W3C standard?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

SWRL a W3C standard?

Gennadie
Hello everyone, if anyone knows that if SWRL is a W3C standard or not?

Thank you!

_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SWRL a W3C standard?

Martin O'Connor-2

No - it is not a W3C standard. 

The initial 2004 submission (https://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/) did not progress to a standardization stage.

The submission itself is pretty solid and includes a full formal specification for the language - so it has become a de facto standard. 

Martin

On Feb 4, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Mingming Qiu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello everyone, if anyone knows that if SWRL is a W3C standard or not?

Thank you!
_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev


_______________________________________________
protege-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-dev