Subject/IRIs of header (Active Ontology tab) annotations

[Varanka, Dalia]

Hello

When a user imports an ontology, some annotations appear in the ontology header, the Active ontology tab, of the ontology receiving the import. Those annotations are relevant to the import, but maybe not to the main ontology.  For example, a hasAuthor property is for the import, not the main ontology.

Is there a way to know if the annotation is limited to the import ontology, perhaps through its IRI, or if it now refers to the the main ontology file?   I'm trying to decide if it's better to delete annotations that do not clearly refer to the main ontology.

Thanks

Dalia

--

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[samsontu]

Hi,

On May 15, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello

When a user imports an ontology, some annotations appear in the ontology header, the Active ontology tab, of the ontology receiving the import. Those annotations are relevant to the import, but maybe not to the main ontology.  For example, a hasAuthor property is for the import, not the main ontology.

Is there a way to know if the annotation is limited to the import ontology, perhaps through its IRI, or if it now refers to the the main ontology file?   I'm trying to decide if it's better to delete annotations that do not clearly refer to the main ontology.

I can’t reproduce this behavior. Is it possible for you to share the ontologies where you see this behavior? Are other people seeing this behavior?

With best regards,

Samson

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[Varanka, Dalia]

Thanks for your reply Samson.

Here is a screen shot of the Active Ontology tab of an ontology of literary geography (prefix lg: ).

It imports the 'Place' ontology from the OntologyDesignPatterns.org site.

Aldo Gangemi is the author of 'Place' but not LiteraryGeography; another person is the creator of LG.

I am debating whether to leave the hasAuthor triple or not.

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:40 AM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

On May 15, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello

When a user imports an ontology, some annotations appear in the ontology header, the Active ontology tab, of the ontology receiving the import. Those annotations are relevant to the import, but maybe not to the main ontology.  For example, a hasAuthor property is for the import, not the main ontology.

Is there a way to know if the annotation is limited to the import ontology, perhaps through its IRI, or if it now refers to the the main ontology file?   I'm trying to decide if it's better to delete annotations that do not clearly refer to the main ontology.

I can’t reproduce this behavior. Is it possible for you to share the ontologies where you see this behavior? Are other people seeing this behavior?

With best regards,

Samson

--

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[samsontu]

I am not doubting your description of the problem. I can’t reproduce your problem on my ontologies (i.e., ontology annotations of imported ontologies don’t appear in the importing ontology header). The issue is some difference either between our Protege configuration or between our ontologies. Having access to your ontologies would help to isolate the problem.

With best regards,

Samson

On May 16, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks for your reply Samson.

Here is a screen shot of the Active Ontology tab of an ontology of literary geography (prefix lg: ).

It imports the 'Place' ontology from the OntologyDesignPatterns.org site.

Aldo Gangemi is the author of 'Place' but not LiteraryGeography; another person is the creator of LG.

I am debating whether to leave the hasAuthor triple or not.

<image.png>

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:40 AM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

On May 15, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello

When a user imports an ontology, some annotations appear in the ontology header, the Active ontology tab, of the ontology receiving the import. Those annotations are relevant to the import, but maybe not to the main ontology.  For example, a hasAuthor property is for the import, not the main ontology.

Is there a way to know if the annotation is limited to the import ontology, perhaps through its IRI, or if it now refers to the the main ontology file?   I'm trying to decide if it's better to delete annotations that do not clearly refer to the main ontology.

I can’t reproduce this behavior. Is it possible for you to share the ontologies where you see this behavior? Are other people seeing this behavior?

With best regards,

Samson

--
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[Varanka, Dalia]

The ontology file is attached. 

I think I may have found the problem

There is also an annotations schema file that was imported

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:55 PM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

I am not doubting your description of the problem. I can’t reproduce your problem on my ontologies (i.e., ontology annotations of imported ontologies don’t appear in the importing ontology header). The issue is some difference either between our Protege configuration or between our ontologies. Having access to your ontologies would help to isolate the problem.

With best regards,

Samson

On May 16, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks for your reply Samson.

Here is a screen shot of the Active Ontology tab of an ontology of literary geography (prefix lg: ).

It imports the 'Place' ontology from the OntologyDesignPatterns.org site.

Aldo Gangemi is the author of 'Place' but not LiteraryGeography; another person is the creator of LG.

I am debating whether to leave the hasAuthor triple or not.

<image.png>

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:40 AM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

On May 15, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello

When a user imports an ontology, some annotations appear in the ontology header, the Active ontology tab, of the ontology receiving the import. Those annotations are relevant to the import, but maybe not to the main ontology.  For example, a hasAuthor property is for the import, not the main ontology.

Is there a way to know if the annotation is limited to the import ontology, perhaps through its IRI, or if it now refers to the the main ontology file?   I'm trying to decide if it's better to delete annotations that do not clearly refer to the main ontology.

I can’t reproduce this behavior. Is it possible for you to share the ontologies where you see this behavior? Are other people seeing this behavior?

With best regards,

Samson

--
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

--

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[samsontu]

Those ontology annotations that appear in your importing ontology are not imported. They occur in the importing ontology, as you can easily see in a text editor view of the importing ontology file. If they are not proper annotations of the importing ontology, yes, delete them.

With best regards,

Samson

On May 16, 2019, at 1:14 PM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

The ontology file is attached. 

I think I may have found the problem

There is also an annotations schema file that was imported

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:55 PM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

I am not doubting your description of the problem. I can’t reproduce your problem on my ontologies (i.e., ontology annotations of imported ontologies don’t appear in the importing ontology header). The issue is some difference either between our Protege configuration or between our ontologies. Having access to your ontologies would help to isolate the problem.

With best regards,

Samson

On May 16, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks for your reply Samson.

Here is a screen shot of the Active Ontology tab of an ontology of literary geography (prefix lg: ).

It imports the 'Place' ontology from the OntologyDesignPatterns.org site.

Aldo Gangemi is the author of 'Place' but not LiteraryGeography; another person is the creator of LG.

I am debating whether to leave the hasAuthor triple or not.

<image.png>

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:40 AM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

On May 15, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello

When a user imports an ontology, some annotations appear in the ontology header, the Active ontology tab, of the ontology receiving the import. Those annotations are relevant to the import, but maybe not to the main ontology.  For example, a hasAuthor property is for the import, not the main ontology.

Is there a way to know if the annotation is limited to the import ontology, perhaps through its IRI, or if it now refers to the the main ontology file?   I'm trying to decide if it's better to delete annotations that do not clearly refer to the main ontology.

I can’t reproduce this behavior. Is it possible for you to share the ontologies where you see this behavior? Are other people seeing this behavior?

With best regards,

Samson

--
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

--
<LitGISv2.owl>_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[Varanka, Dalia]

Thanks.

How do we get to the text editor view?

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:26 PM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Those ontology annotations that appear in your importing ontology are not imported. They occur in the importing ontology, as you can easily see in a text editor view of the importing ontology file. If they are not proper annotations of the importing ontology, yes, delete them.

With best regards,

Samson

On May 16, 2019, at 1:14 PM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

The ontology file is attached. 

I think I may have found the problem

There is also an annotations schema file that was imported

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:55 PM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

I am not doubting your description of the problem. I can’t reproduce your problem on my ontologies (i.e., ontology annotations of imported ontologies don’t appear in the importing ontology header). The issue is some difference either between our Protege configuration or between our ontologies. Having access to your ontologies would help to isolate the problem.

With best regards,

Samson

On May 16, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks for your reply Samson.

Here is a screen shot of the Active Ontology tab of an ontology of literary geography (prefix lg: ).

It imports the 'Place' ontology from the OntologyDesignPatterns.org site.

Aldo Gangemi is the author of 'Place' but not LiteraryGeography; another person is the creator of LG.

I am debating whether to leave the hasAuthor triple or not.

<image.png>

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:40 AM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

On May 15, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello

When a user imports an ontology, some annotations appear in the ontology header, the Active ontology tab, of the ontology receiving the import. Those annotations are relevant to the import, but maybe not to the main ontology.  For example, a hasAuthor property is for the import, not the main ontology.

Is there a way to know if the annotation is limited to the import ontology, perhaps through its IRI, or if it now refers to the the main ontology file?   I'm trying to decide if it's better to delete annotations that do not clearly refer to the main ontology.

I can’t reproduce this behavior. Is it possible for you to share the ontologies where you see this behavior? Are other people seeing this behavior?

With best regards,

Samson

--
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

--
<LitGISv2.owl>_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

--

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[samsontu]

On May 16, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks.

How do we get to the text editor view?

Launch your favorite text editor (MS Word, Note++, BBEdit, or whatever), and open the LitGISv2.owl file.

One thing: it's best NOT to edit the .owl file in your text editor.

With best regards,

Samson

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:26 PM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Those ontology annotations that appear in your importing ontology are not imported. They occur in the importing ontology, as you can easily see in a text editor view of the importing ontology file. If they are not proper annotations of the importing ontology, yes, delete them.

<PastedGraphic-2.png>

With best regards,

Samson

On May 16, 2019, at 1:14 PM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

The ontology file is attached. 

I think I may have found the problem

There is also an annotations schema file that was imported

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:55 PM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

I am not doubting your description of the problem. I can’t reproduce your problem on my ontologies (i.e., ontology annotations of imported ontologies don’t appear in the importing ontology header). The issue is some difference either between our Protege configuration or between our ontologies. Having access to your ontologies would help to isolate the problem.

With best regards,

Samson

On May 16, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks for your reply Samson.

Here is a screen shot of the Active Ontology tab of an ontology of literary geography (prefix lg: ).

It imports the 'Place' ontology from the OntologyDesignPatterns.org site.

Aldo Gangemi is the author of 'Place' but not LiteraryGeography; another person is the creator of LG.

I am debating whether to leave the hasAuthor triple or not.

<image.png>

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:40 AM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

On May 15, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello

When a user imports an ontology, some annotations appear in the ontology header, the Active ontology tab, of the ontology receiving the import. Those annotations are relevant to the import, but maybe not to the main ontology.  For example, a hasAuthor property is for the import, not the main ontology.

Is there a way to know if the annotation is limited to the import ontology, perhaps through its IRI, or if it now refers to the the main ontology file?   I'm trying to decide if it's better to delete annotations that do not clearly refer to the main ontology.

I can’t reproduce this behavior. Is it possible for you to share the ontologies where you see this behavior? Are other people seeing this behavior?

With best regards,

Samson

--
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

--
<LitGISv2.owl>_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

--
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

[Varanka, Dalia]

Thank you for your generous help.

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:57 PM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

On May 16, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks.

How do we get to the text editor view?

Launch your favorite text editor (MS Word, Note++, BBEdit, or whatever), and open the LitGISv2.owl file.

One thing: it's best NOT to edit the .owl file in your text editor.

With best regards,

Samson

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:26 PM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Those ontology annotations that appear in your importing ontology are not imported. They occur in the importing ontology, as you can easily see in a text editor view of the importing ontology file. If they are not proper annotations of the importing ontology, yes, delete them.

<PastedGraphic-2.png>

With best regards,

Samson

On May 16, 2019, at 1:14 PM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

The ontology file is attached. 

I think I may have found the problem

There is also an annotations schema file that was imported

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:55 PM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

I am not doubting your description of the problem. I can’t reproduce your problem on my ontologies (i.e., ontology annotations of imported ontologies don’t appear in the importing ontology header). The issue is some difference either between our Protege configuration or between our ontologies. Having access to your ontologies would help to isolate the problem.

With best regards,

Samson

On May 16, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks for your reply Samson.

Here is a screen shot of the Active Ontology tab of an ontology of literary geography (prefix lg: ).

It imports the 'Place' ontology from the OntologyDesignPatterns.org site.

Aldo Gangemi is the author of 'Place' but not LiteraryGeography; another person is the creator of LG.

I am debating whether to leave the hasAuthor triple or not.

<image.png>

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:40 AM Samson Tu <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

On May 15, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Varanka, Dalia <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello

When a user imports an ontology, some annotations appear in the ontology header, the Active ontology tab, of the ontology receiving the import. Those annotations are relevant to the import, but maybe not to the main ontology.  For example, a hasAuthor property is for the import, not the main ontology.

Is there a way to know if the annotation is limited to the import ontology, perhaps through its IRI, or if it now refers to the the main ontology file?   I'm trying to decide if it's better to delete annotations that do not clearly refer to the main ontology.

I can’t reproduce this behavior. Is it possible for you to share the ontologies where you see this behavior? Are other people seeing this behavior?

With best regards,

Samson

--
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

--
<LitGISv2.owl>_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

--
_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

--

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user