?errors in webprotege

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

?errors in webprotege

Bohms, H.M. (Michel)

Many ontologies that are fine in protege and webprotege get erros in webprotege.

Example included.

 

Screen:

 

Any idea?

 

Thx Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 


_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

CommonOntologyInternational.ttl (33K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ?errors in webprotege

Bohms, H.M. (Michel)

I wanted to say:

Many ontologies that are fine in protege and topbraid get erros in webprotege.

 

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

From: protege-user [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bohms, H.M. (Michel)
Sent: dinsdag 22 september 2015 16:10
To: User support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
Subject: [protege-user] ?errors in webprotege

 

Many ontologies that are fine in protege and webprotege get erros in webprotege.

Example included.

 

Screen:

 

Any idea?

 

Thx Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 


_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ?errors in webprotege

Matthew Horridge-2
Administrator
This could be due to the version of the OWL API that is used in Protege vs WebProtege, but it could also be due to problems with resolving imports.  

If you can post the relevant ontologies to the list I can take a look.

Cheers,

Matthew



On 22 Sep 2015, at 07:33, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) <[hidden email]> wrote:

I wanted to say:

Many ontologies that are fine in protege and topbraid get erros in webprotege.

 

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

<image002.gif>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

From: protege-user [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bohms, H.M. (Michel)
Sent: dinsdag 22 september 2015 16:10
To: User support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
Subject: [protege-user] ?errors in webprotege

 

Many ontologies that are fine in protege and webprotege get erros in webprotege.

Example included.

 

Screen:

<image003.png>

 

Any idea?

 

Thx Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

<image002.gif>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user


_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ?errors in webprotege

grantpax
Is the roadmap for Protege desktop posted anywhere? (looking for v4 of the OWL API)

On Sep 22, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Matthew Horridge <[hidden email]> wrote:

This could be due to the version of the OWL API that is used in Protege vs WebProtege, but it could also be due to problems with resolving imports.  

If you can post the relevant ontologies to the list I can take a look.

Cheers,

Matthew



On 22 Sep 2015, at 07:33, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) <[hidden email]> wrote:

I wanted to say:
Many ontologies that are fine in protege and topbraid get erros in webprotege.

 

 

 
Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability
T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

From: protege-user [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bohms, H.M. (Michel)
Sent: dinsdag 22 september 2015 16:10
To: User support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
Subject: [protege-user] ?errors in webprotege
 
Many ontologies that are fine in protege and webprotege get erros in webprotege.
Example included.

 

Screen:
<image003.png>

 

Any idea?

 

Thx Michel

 

 
Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability
T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user


_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ?errors in webprotege

Bohms, H.M. (Michel)
In reply to this post by Matthew Horridge-2

Thx, I will investigate the import situation.

 

In case an ontology is not available remotely but I can have/get it otherwise, what would happen if I put it locally on webprotege? Would the errors go away?

(ie would it work like in topbraid composer where first a local check is done to find the file and next a remote check)

 

Thx again, Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

From: protege-user [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Matthew Horridge
Sent: dinsdag 22 september 2015 18:22
To: User support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
Subject: Re: [protege-user] ?errors in webprotege

 

This could be due to the version of the OWL API that is used in Protege vs WebProtege, but it could also be due to problems with resolving imports.  

 

If you can post the relevant ontologies to the list I can take a look.

 

Cheers,

 

Matthew

 

 

 

On 22 Sep 2015, at 07:33, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) <[hidden email]> wrote:

 

I wanted to say:

Many ontologies that are fine in protege and topbraid get erros in webprotege.

 

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

<image002.gif>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

From: protege-user [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bohms, H.M. (Michel)
Sent: dinsdag 22 september 2015 16:10
To: User support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
Subject: [protege-user] ?errors in webprotege

 

Many ontologies that are fine in protege and webprotege get erros in webprotege.

Example included.

 

Screen:

<image003.png>

 

Any idea?

 

Thx Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

<image002.gif>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

 


_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ?errors in webprotege

Matthew Horridge-2
Administrator
Hi Michel,

Thx, I will investigate the import situation.

 

In case an ontology is not available remotely but I can have/get it otherwise, what would happen if I put it locally on webprotege? Would the errors go away?

(ie would it work like in topbraid composer where first a local check is done to find the file and next a remote check)


What you can do is,

(1) Place the imports closure into a single directory.
(2) Name the “root ontology”, root-ontology.owl
(3) Zip up the directory
(4) Upload the zip file

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Matthew


 

Thx again, Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

<image001.gif>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

From: protege-user [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Matthew Horridge
Sent: dinsdag 22 september 2015 18:22
To: User support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
Subject: Re: [protege-user] ?errors in webprotege

 

This could be due to the version of the OWL API that is used in Protege vs WebProtege, but it could also be due to problems with resolving imports.  

 

If you can post the relevant ontologies to the list I can take a look.

 

Cheers,

 

Matthew

 

 

 

On 22 Sep 2015, at 07:33, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) <[hidden email]> wrote:

 

I wanted to say:

Many ontologies that are fine in protege and topbraid get erros in webprotege.

 

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

<image002.gif>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

From: protege-user [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bohms, H.M. (Michel)
Sent: dinsdag 22 september 2015 16:10
To: User support for WebProtege and Protege Desktop
Subject: [protege-user] ?errors in webprotege

 

Many ontologies that are fine in protege and webprotege get erros in webprotege.

Example included.

 

Screen:

<image003.png>

 

Any idea?

 

Thx Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sr. Research Scientist
Structural Reliability

T +31 (0)88 866 31 07
M +31 (0)63 038 12 20
[hidden email]

Location

 

<image002.gif>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user

 

_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user


_______________________________________________
protege-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-user