[protege-owl] Daily posting of Latest Build

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[protege-owl] Daily posting of Latest Build

Mark Feblowitz
Would it be possible to resume the practice of daily postings of
latest build tarball to SourceForge (http://protege-owl.sourceforge.net/)?

Posting of pre-beta versions with bug fixes is especially important
for bugs such as the loss of the Property View. A daily build with
some things not yet fixed is preferable to waiting many days for a
beta with many/most fixes.

Thanks,

Mark

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[protege-owl] Re: Daily posting of Latest Build

Ronnie Valkky
Hi Mark,

Could you, please clarify me the following links; their focus and
relationships ?
Particularly where are the master source files and who is responsible ?

1. http://sourceforge.net/index.php <-- SourceForge web site of Protégé-OWL
= ?
2. http://protege-owl.sourceforge.net/ <--- SourceForge.net = ?
3. http://www.co-ode.org/ <--- CO-ODE and HyOntUse project = ?

Classification in building ontologies is important. Are Protege OWL
feedbacks being classified now ?
For example:
~ bug /severe= causes loosing of data.....
~ important feature/needed in next release but can wait...
~ nice to have feature/to be discussed...

What kind of delays have you met in getting the latest build suitable to you
?

Cheers,
Ronnie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Feblowitz" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:15 AM
Subject: [protege-owl] Daily posting of Latest Build


> Would it be possible to resume the practice of daily postings of
> latest build tarball to SourceForge (http://protege-owl.sourceforge.net/)?
>
> Posting of pre-beta versions with bug fixes is especially important
> for bugs such as the loss of the Property View. A daily build with
> some things not yet fixed is preferable to waiting many days for a
> beta with many/most fixes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[protege-owl] Re: Daily posting of Latest Build

Rinke Hoekstra-3
Hi Ronnie,

There's a Mantis bugtracker in use for Protege-OWL at Manchester
University.
Regarding your other question:
1) Just the regular Sourceforge website. Has nothing to do with Protege-OWL

2) The Protege-OWL Sourceforge project website. For those interested in
latest betas and sources (I believe there's currently some issue in
keeping this website up-to-date, but it will be fixed soon... see the
reaction of Nick on the question by Jesús Prieto)

3) The website of the co-ode project, currently the base for most of the
  OWL development done for Protege (Martin O'Connor, the SWRL guy, is
based in Stanford though, I believe). The efforts of the co-ode projects
are directed towards better accessibility and support for users of OWL
development tools (in this case Protege).
The Protege-team itself is based in Stanford.

-Rinke



Ronnie Valkky wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> Could you, please clarify me the following links; their focus and
> relationships ?
> Particularly where are the master source files and who is responsible ?
>
> 1. http://sourceforge.net/index.php <-- SourceForge web site of Protégé-OWL
> = ?
> 2. http://protege-owl.sourceforge.net/ <--- SourceForge.net = ?
> 3. http://www.co-ode.org/ <--- CO-ODE and HyOntUse project = ?
>
> Classification in building ontologies is important. Are Protege OWL
> feedbacks being classified now ?
> For example:
> ~ bug /severe= causes loosing of data.....
> ~ important feature/needed in next release but can wait...
> ~ nice to have feature/to be discussed...
>
> What kind of delays have you met in getting the latest build suitable to you
> ?
>
> Cheers,
> Ronnie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Feblowitz" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:15 AM
> Subject: [protege-owl] Daily posting of Latest Build
>
>
>> Would it be possible to resume the practice of daily postings of
>> latest build tarball to SourceForge (http://protege-owl.sourceforge.net/)?
>>
>> Posting of pre-beta versions with bug fixes is especially important
>> for bugs such as the loss of the Property View. A daily build with
>> some things not yet fixed is preferable to waiting many days for a
>> beta with many/most fixes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html
>>
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html
>
>

--
--------------------------------------
Rinke Hoekstra         [hidden email]
T: +31-20-5253499    F: +31-20-5253495
Leibniz Center for Law,    Law Faculty
University of Amsterdam,   PO Box 1030
1000 BA  Amsterdam,    The Netherlands
--------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[protege-owl] Re: Daily posting of Latest Build

Ronnie Valkky
thanks Rinke,
-Ronnie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rinke Hoekstra" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 1:36 PM
Subject: [protege-owl] Re: Daily posting of Latest Build


Hi Ronnie,

There's a Mantis bugtracker in use for Protege-OWL at Manchester
University.
Regarding your other question:
1) Just the regular Sourceforge website. Has nothing to do with Protege-OWL

2) The Protege-OWL Sourceforge project website. For those interested in
latest betas and sources (I believe there's currently some issue in
keeping this website up-to-date, but it will be fixed soon... see the
reaction of Nick on the question by Jesús Prieto)

3) The website of the co-ode project, currently the base for most of the
  OWL development done for Protege (Martin O'Connor, the SWRL guy, is
based in Stanford though, I believe). The efforts of the co-ode projects
are directed towards better accessibility and support for users of OWL
development tools (in this case Protege).
The Protege-team itself is based in Stanford.

-Rinke



Ronnie Valkky wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Could you, please clarify me the following links; their focus and
> relationships ?
> Particularly where are the master source files and who is responsible ?
>
> 1. http://sourceforge.net/index.php <-- SourceForge web site of
Protégé-OWL

> = ?
> 2. http://protege-owl.sourceforge.net/ <--- SourceForge.net = ?
> 3. http://www.co-ode.org/ <--- CO-ODE and HyOntUse project = ?
>
> Classification in building ontologies is important. Are Protege OWL
> feedbacks being classified now ?
> For example:
> ~ bug /severe= causes loosing of data.....
> ~ important feature/needed in next release but can wait...
> ~ nice to have feature/to be discussed...
>
> What kind of delays have you met in getting the latest build suitable to
you

> ?
>
> Cheers,
> Ronnie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Feblowitz" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:15 AM
> Subject: [protege-owl] Daily posting of Latest Build
>
>
>> Would it be possible to resume the practice of daily postings of
>> latest build tarball to SourceForge
(http://protege-owl.sourceforge.net/)?

>>
>> Posting of pre-beta versions with bug fixes is especially important
>> for bugs such as the loss of the Property View. A daily build with
>> some things not yet fixed is preferable to waiting many days for a
>> beta with many/most fixes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html
>>
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html
>
>

--
--------------------------------------
Rinke Hoekstra         [hidden email]
T: +31-20-5253499    F: +31-20-5253495
Leibniz Center for Law,    Law Faculty
University of Amsterdam,   PO Box 1030
1000 BA  Amsterdam,    The Netherlands
--------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[protege-owl] Re: Daily posting of Latest Build

Jennifer Vendetti
Administrator
In reply to this post by Mark Feblowitz
Mark,

We are in a transition process in regards to the source code.  The
Protege-OWL source code is being moved out of SourceForge and into the
Subversion repository that is hosted at Stanford
(http://smi-protege.stanford.edu/svn/), which is not a particularly
trivial task.  This is the Subversion repository that already contains
all of the source code for Core Protege and Protege-Frames, as well as a
variety of plug-ins that are bundled with the Protege installation.  The
move is scheduled to take place in the next week or two.

After the move is complete and any kinks in the build process are worked
out, we plan to resume our weekly beta builds on Wednesdays.  If a
weekly build is not sufficient for your needs, we have detailed
instructions on our Web site for accessing the source code in our
Subversion repository:
(http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/svn/contribute.html).  Both
Protege-Frames and Protege-OWL come with Ant build files ("build.xml")
that you can use to build the source code.  Granted - the build
instructions for using the Protege-OWL Ant build file will need to be
updated as the documentation currently has references to CVS/SourceForge.

Jennifer

Mark Feblowitz wrote:

> Would it be possible to resume the practice of daily postings of
> latest build tarball to SourceForge
> (http://protege-owl.sourceforge.net/)?
>
> Posting of pre-beta versions with bug fixes is especially important
> for bugs such as the loss of the Property View. A daily build with
> some things not yet fixed is preferable to waiting many days for a
> beta with many/most fixes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Daily posting of Latest Build

Nick Drummond
So as to avoid confusion, I've moved the page that was at
http://protege-owl.sourceforge.net/
We will make as much as is feasible available again when the move to
subversion has been successful (which is in the process today).

Please bear with us.

Nick

Jennifer Vendetti wrote:

> Mark,
>
> We are in a transition process in regards to the source code.  The
> Protege-OWL source code is being moved out of SourceForge and into the
> Subversion repository that is hosted at Stanford
> (http://smi-protege.stanford.edu/svn/), which is not a particularly
> trivial task.  This is the Subversion repository that already contains
> all of the source code for Core Protege and Protege-Frames, as well as
> a variety of plug-ins that are bundled with the Protege installation.  
> The move is scheduled to take place in the next week or two.
>
> After the move is complete and any kinks in the build process are
> worked out, we plan to resume our weekly beta builds on Wednesdays.  
> If a weekly build is not sufficient for your needs, we have detailed
> instructions on our Web site for accessing the source code in our
> Subversion repository:
> (http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/svn/contribute.html).  Both
> Protege-Frames and Protege-OWL come with Ant build files ("build.xml")
> that you can use to build the source code.  Granted - the build
> instructions for using the Protege-OWL Ant build file will need to be
> updated as the documentation currently has references to CVS/SourceForge.
>
> Jennifer
>
> Mark Feblowitz wrote:
>
>> Would it be possible to resume the practice of daily postings of
>> latest build tarball to SourceForge
>> (http://protege-owl.sourceforge.net/)?
>>
>> Posting of pre-beta versions with bug fixes is especially important
>> for bugs such as the loss of the Property View. A daily build with
>> some things not yet fixed is preferable to waiting many days for a
>> beta with many/most fixes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe go to
>> http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html
>>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html
>
>

--

Nick Drummond

http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~drummond/ <http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/%7Edrummond/>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe go to http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html