[protege-owl] Re: Fwd: Re: Saving Ontology's Partly Information + Lexical Information
Sorry for the delay in response - this one got lost.
I'm not sure what you mean about saving using DC - if you can clarify
this it might be interesting
You would need to import DC into your ontology(ies). All DC contains (as
far as I'm aware) is a set of annotation properties you can then use to
annotate your classes, properties, and individuals (and actually some
restrictions etc) with authorship metadata.
Neury at Work wrote:
> Sorry being a little repetitive.
> But, is there any method in Protege that saves information (I was not
> able to find it) using the Dublin Core or do I have to implement it.
> Thank you again.
> Neury Freitas
> On 1/19/06, *Peter North* < [hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> If you are using Dublin Core then these additional inserts go
> in-line in the ontology (in just the same way that an XML comment
> can be interspersed with XML elements).
> Unlike XML comments, these Dublin Core assertions can be persisted
> anywhere an Ontology can be persisted (using Protege-OWL, this can
> be a file system or a database).
> On 1/19/06, *Neury at Work* < [hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> First of all, thank you for the information!
> I am still not sure if I can save this information in a
> separate ontology, because it has a very specific format.
> I think that the idea of using the "Dublin Core" meet my
> needs, however I would like to know where would you recomend
> me to save this information.
> Inside one of the Project files or do I need to creat another
> file and save the information in it.
> Thank you again! :))
> Neury Freitas
> On 1/16/06, *Nick Drummond* <
> [hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
> Hi Neury,
> Do you mean that for each class/property you need to add
> You can add additional annotation properties for these and
> fill in
> values where required.
> Perhaps all of these annotations can be stored in a
> seperate ontology
> which imports this one?
> This means you could have a seperate ontology file for
> each user.
> Neury at Work wrote:
>> Now I am facing a new small problem.
>> I use the Ontology loaded in Protege to get all the
> properties and
>> concepts, then I get Lexical Information for all of these
>> and concepts. In the next step the user choose which
> information he
>> wants to save and at this point my problem appear.
>> I need to save some additional information (not modeled
> in the classes
>> from protege). These information are directly correlated
> with the
>> concept / property mapped in Protege.
>> I would like to know if somebody could help me, giving me
> some advice
>> on how / where to save these information.
>> First I though saving it in a external file, but it does
> not seams to
>> be the best solution.
>> Thank you so much for the help,
>> Neury Freitas
> Nick Drummond
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~drummond/ > <http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/%7Edrummond/> <
> To unsubscribe go to
> http://protege.stanford.edu/community/subscribe.html >